B
Baxter Tiberius
Guest
So i have decided to wait a minimum of 2 years to neuter. Possibly won't ever do it.
The only lingering concern I have is the theory that testicular cancer increases. Which apparently the jury is still out on (i've read all the threads on here).
I was curious though. In human males, its a fairly well known fact that periodic "release" is not only enjoyable, its important for proper function of prostate and testicles.
I've read that it plays a role in "keeping things moving" down there, and wards off risks like prostate or testicular cancer.
When I hear people say "If you aren't going to stud him out, you should neuter him" ... my mind goes to this topic instead. The fact that a dog who is "bred" actually gets to "release" periodically.
Is there any school of thought - or even common practice, where male dogs can be "released" every so often in a controlled manner by a practitioner, so as to encourage a healthy reproductive system?
I can imagine that a male human who never ejaculates may have some major issues down there after some time.
The only lingering concern I have is the theory that testicular cancer increases. Which apparently the jury is still out on (i've read all the threads on here).
I was curious though. In human males, its a fairly well known fact that periodic "release" is not only enjoyable, its important for proper function of prostate and testicles.
I've read that it plays a role in "keeping things moving" down there, and wards off risks like prostate or testicular cancer.
When I hear people say "If you aren't going to stud him out, you should neuter him" ... my mind goes to this topic instead. The fact that a dog who is "bred" actually gets to "release" periodically.
Is there any school of thought - or even common practice, where male dogs can be "released" every so often in a controlled manner by a practitioner, so as to encourage a healthy reproductive system?
I can imagine that a male human who never ejaculates may have some major issues down there after some time.