[MENTION=13682]madie4589[/MENTION] The wonderful things about dogs is that you can find one that matches the lifestyles of various people. If you're an active person, there is a dog for you. If you are a lazy couch potato there is a dog for you. That said, there are dogs that are bred to be more aggressive, and therefore are labeled aggressive breeds because they are bred to protect and, unfortunately, some are bred to fight. While the word "aggressive" does have a negative connotation it is an accurate description of various breeds. they are very smart dogs and can be trained easily (much easier than an EB

) but an owner of these breeds need to know their dog, the breed characteristic to make an educated decision if this is the right fit for them/their family.
I have many friends with extremely well trained, sweet pitbulls who I would never have a problem bringing my dogs around, so I don't have anything against the breed. I have something against the owners that don't know their breed and do not take the time to train their dog. So many shelters wouldn't have dogs abandoned by their owner if they took the time to educate themselves.
I have actually wanted a pit for a very long time but because my husband is active duty in the military we had to take his job into consideration. Since we move every couple of years, we took into account that we could move to a place where there is a pitbull ban and needing to give up a dog so we crossed pitbulls (and a few other dogs) off our list of dogs we should consider.
I digress. Totally agree with you - the aggressive word wasn't meant to be a negative connotation, just a descriptor of the dog's potential/innate temperament which, of course, can be controlled by proper training.