ChrisNZ
New member
Hi all,
Hoping for some opinions / advice from others in regards to going the surgery route or conservative / other way when it comes to a CCL rupture. Unfortunately Zita (picture attached :D) had been having a noticeable limp a couple of weeks ago, especially after going for a long walk. Currently, she has a slight limp / restricted range of motion but it doesn't seem to be as bad as it was earlier. The vet has said "on evaluation she had a right pelvic limb lameness, grade III/V. There was mild right pelvic limb muscle atrophy. On orthopaedic
examination there was right stifle effusion and craniocaudal instability with tibial thrust. There was pain on right stifle hyperextension.
The right patella could be pushed medially but not completely luxated. The left stifle had no palpable effusion and no craniocaudal
instability was elicited. The left patella tracked normally. TPLO surgery has been recommended."
I am in two minds after reading success stories from those who have done the surgery and also those who opted to not go ahead with it. Also there's the negative stories from both ways. Obviously being a British Bulldog, the risk with the surgery is there and also the risk of possible infection after surgery etc. She still seems to be active and it's hard to keep her rested as she constantly wants to go for a walk. We also have another British Bulldog and both are very attached to each other.
Sorry for the rant - in summary, I am mainly just after your thoughts on the outcome from both options from those who have been through them and whether I should get a second opinion from a vet here / see about a leg brace etc? The cost of the surgery is estimated to be between $8000-$10500 NZD however we do have pet insurance for them which covers 80%.
Any thoughts from other bulldog owners?
Thanks all.
Hoping for some opinions / advice from others in regards to going the surgery route or conservative / other way when it comes to a CCL rupture. Unfortunately Zita (picture attached :D) had been having a noticeable limp a couple of weeks ago, especially after going for a long walk. Currently, she has a slight limp / restricted range of motion but it doesn't seem to be as bad as it was earlier. The vet has said "on evaluation she had a right pelvic limb lameness, grade III/V. There was mild right pelvic limb muscle atrophy. On orthopaedic
examination there was right stifle effusion and craniocaudal instability with tibial thrust. There was pain on right stifle hyperextension.
The right patella could be pushed medially but not completely luxated. The left stifle had no palpable effusion and no craniocaudal
instability was elicited. The left patella tracked normally. TPLO surgery has been recommended."
I am in two minds after reading success stories from those who have done the surgery and also those who opted to not go ahead with it. Also there's the negative stories from both ways. Obviously being a British Bulldog, the risk with the surgery is there and also the risk of possible infection after surgery etc. She still seems to be active and it's hard to keep her rested as she constantly wants to go for a walk. We also have another British Bulldog and both are very attached to each other.
Sorry for the rant - in summary, I am mainly just after your thoughts on the outcome from both options from those who have been through them and whether I should get a second opinion from a vet here / see about a leg brace etc? The cost of the surgery is estimated to be between $8000-$10500 NZD however we do have pet insurance for them which covers 80%.
Any thoughts from other bulldog owners?
Thanks all.